Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sandra Samir vs Olivia Nicholls Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Samir vs Nicholls analysis and find out who is favored!
Sandra Samir vs Olivia Nicholls Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Samir 1 - 0 Nicholls
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Samir has won 48.75% of points on their second serve, while Nicholls has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Samir, in recent form, has won 56.73% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nicholls has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.75% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Samir has saved 51.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nicholls has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Samir has won 67.53% of matches played (W/L 52/ 25), with Nicholls winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Samir has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 201/ 112), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3). Nicholls has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 17/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Samir has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.47% of matches (W/L 40/ 13), where as Nicholls has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Samir winning 1 times and Nicholls being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Samir winning 2 and Nicholls winning 1. The last match between Samir and Nicholls was at the W25 Montemor-O-Novo, 02-09-2020, First, Hard with Sandra Samir getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:42:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Samir and Nicholls have played a deciding set 1 times, with Samir winning 1 times and Nicholls 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Samir winning 0, and Nicholls 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Samir has played against opponents with an average rank of 147.82 while Nicholls has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Samir has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nicholls has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Samir has converted 48.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nicholls has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
508
Rank
342
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
64% (432-248)
Career Total W/L
45% (32-39)
69% (24-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Sandra Samir vs Olivia Nicholls For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Samir VS Nicholls
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Sandra Samir | Olivia Nicholls |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:42:0 | 2:42:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (53/89) | 67% (70/104) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (34/53) | 56% (39/70) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (18/36) | 38% (13/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (8/18) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (52/104) | 42% (37/89) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(2) 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Sandra Samir
Player
Olivia Nicholls
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
104)
104
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sandra Samir | Olivia Nicholls |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (24/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (51/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (409/322) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (18/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 54 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 100 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 207.97 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (1260/2259) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (765/1260) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (487/999) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (163/337) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (1129/2300) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (18/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (24/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (26/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (26/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sandra Samir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Tubello
Player
Sandra Samir
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Oliwia Szymczuch
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Ada Piestrzynska
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Sandra Samir
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Sandra Samir
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Fanny Ostlund
56%
(
64 of
115)
1st Serve %
73%
(
102 of
139)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
53 of
102)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
66 of
139)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Bella Bergkvist Larsson
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Sandra Samir
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Jenna Dean
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julie Struplova
Player
Sandra Samir
79%
(
68 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
50%
(
43 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Olivia Nicholls Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shuyue Ma
Player
Olivia Nicholls
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroko Kuwata
Player
Olivia Nicholls
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
35 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Samir Vs Nicholls Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Samir are available here and Nicholls photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
